CopyFormula / Field guide

Field guide

Choose a copywriting formula by the job your page must do

Compare six copywriting structures using one clearly labeled example, then choose a formula that fits your reader and offer.

A formula is a way to arrange a conversation. It cannot supply the offer, the evidence, or the reason someone should care. Start with those facts; choose the sequence afterward.

We will use one constructed example throughout this guide: a 60-minute proposal review for freelance web designers. The buyer brings a draft proposal and receives an annotated version plus a short list of revisions. This is a teaching example, not an existing service or a customer result.

Write the facts before choosing a formula

  • Reader: a freelance web designer with a proposal to send.
  • Immediate problem: the proposal lists tasks but does not explain scope, decisions, or the next step clearly.
  • Offer: a 60-minute review of that proposal.
  • Deliverable: an annotated draft and prioritized revision list.
  • Evidence: none supplied in this example. Do not invent testimonials, results, or credentials.
  • Action: review the session details and book if the scope fits.

The plain version is already useful: “Bring your draft proposal to a 60-minute review. Leave with annotations and a short list of changes to make before you send it.” The formula should clarify that sentence, not bury it.

AIDA: when the reader needs the whole story

Attention: “Is your proposal clear to someone who did not sit through the discovery call?” Interest: “A review looks at the scope, the decisions the client needs to make, and the next step.” Desire: “You leave with annotations and a prioritized revision list.” Action: “Review the session details and book a time.”

AIDA gives a longer page a useful order. It becomes tedious when each step repeats the same vague promise. If the reader is already comparing review services, open with the deliverable and scope instead of a dramatic attention grabber.

PAS: when the problem is already familiar

Problem: “Your proposal describes the work, but the scope is hard to find.” Consequence: “That can lead to another round of questions before the client can decide.” Solution: “In a 60-minute review, we mark the unclear sections and make a revision list.”

The middle step is where copy often becomes dishonest. Describe a plausible consequence; do not tell the reader their business is failing because of one draft.

Before–After–Bridge: when the deliverable is easy to picture

Before: a proposal with a long task list and an unclear scope. After: an annotated draft with a concise revision list. Bridge: a review that checks the promise, scope, exclusions, decision points, and next step.

Keep “after” within the offer’s control. A clearer proposal is a reasonable aim. A signed client contract is not a result this review can promise.

Feature–Advantage–Benefit: when the draft reads like a specification

Feature: an annotated proposal. Advantage: comments appear next to the lines that need attention. Benefit: the designer can revise the draft without trying to remember a verbal critique. Follow the same chain for the prioritized list and the session recording only if a recording is actually included.

Problem–Promise–Proof–Proposal: when trust is the main obstacle

Name the unclear proposal, promise the specific review and deliverables, then show real evidence. That might be an anonymized before-and-after excerpt used with permission, an accurate description of the reviewer’s experience, or a sample annotation. If no proof is available, omit the proof claim and show the review process instead. Finish with the scope, price, and booking step.

Question–Answer–Action: when the reader wants a direct answer

“What will I get from a proposal review?” Answer: “A 60-minute walkthrough, an annotated draft, and a short list of revisions.” Action: “See what the session covers.” This short structure works well above a detailed FAQ or beside a booking button.

Pick one primary structure

  1. If readers need context, start with AIDA.
  2. If they already recognize the problem, try PAS.
  3. If the deliverable is visible, try Before–After–Bridge.
  4. If the draft is a feature list, translate it with Feature–Advantage–Benefit.
  5. If trust is the barrier, show the process and genuine proof.
  6. If the page is short, answer the reader’s question directly.

You can borrow a sentence from another formula. You do not need to force all six into one page. Next, follow the worked proposal-copy example from rough notes to a usable opening, or use the headline worksheet with your own offer. The printable brief kit keeps the facts, drafts, and evidence check together.